Print this page and work through it on paper. Revealed answers are never printed, so you can check one question and still print a clean sheet.

  1. Show the solution to question 1

    (a) Solve for and substitute. From we get , and because a square root is never negative. Then .

    The Cartesian curve is the parabola , but only its right half, , is traced. At the point is , the vertex, and as increases increases, so the curve is traced rightward and downward, away from the vertex, forever. The left half of the parabola is never reached — eliminating the parameter enlarged the curve, and the restriction is what repairs it.

    (b) Use . Solve for the trigonometric functions: and , so

    This is the circle of radius centered at . At the point is , the rightmost point; at it is , the lowest point. Rightmost then lowest means the circle is traced clockwise — the minus sign in reverses the standard orientation. Since and have period , the interval traces the circle exactly once, starting and ending at .

    (c) Segment from to . Using the standard form , :

    Check: gives and gives . Eliminating gives , the line through both points, restricted to .

    For the reverse direction swap the roles of the endpoints: , , . (Equivalently, replace by in the first parametrization.) The set of points is identical; only the orientation has changed, and it is the orientation that a later integral would see.

  2. Show the solution to question 2

    Derivatives first. and , so wherever ,

    (a) Horizontal tangents need and . Now at , and at all four. The points are

    in that order of — the four "corners" of the figure eight.

    Vertical tangents need and : at and , where . The points are and , the two ends of the figure.

    (b) The origin. forces , so or ; at both, . So the curve passes through the origin twice, once in each lobe. Both times , so the slope formula is legal:

    The two tangent lines at the origin are and ; the figure eight crosses itself at right angles.

    (c) Second derivative. Differentiate the slope with respect to — not — and divide by again. With and , the quotient rule gives

    At : , , , so this equals . Dividing by ,

    Interpretation: the curve is concave down at . That is consistent with (a), where the tangent at this point was horizontal: a horizontal tangent with negative second derivative is a local maximum of the curve, and is indeed the top of the right-hand lobe (since ).

  3. Show the solution to question 3

    (a) Speed, then substitution. and , so

    Both and are increasing on , so no point is visited twice. Substitute , ; the limits become :

    Sanity check: . The chord from to has length , and the curve is slightly longer than its chord, as it must be.

    (b) The speed is just . By the product rule,

    So the speed is on . The speed is positive for and the direction of motion turns steadily through half a turn, so the curve never retraces itself (it is the involute of the unit circle — the path of the end of a string unwound from the circle). Hence

    Sanity check: . The curve starts at and ends at ; the chord between them has length , so a length of about for a curve that bows outward is reasonable.

  4. Show the solution to question 4

    (a) Cartesian to polar, with the quadrant check. , and . The arctangent of is , but that angle points into the first quadrant while the point, with and , lies in the third. Add : . Check: and . ✓

    Every polar representation is obtained by adding full turns, or by negating and adding a half turn:

    (b) Polar to Cartesian needs no thought. and . The point is : face the direction and walk four units backwards, into the third quadrant.

    (c) Multiply by to make the conversions available. becomes . Completing both squares,

    the circle of radius centered at . Multiplying by adds the pole as a solution, but the pole was already on the curve: when . (Consistent with the circle: its center is at distance from the origin, equal to its radius, so it passes through the origin.)

    (d) Substitute , . . Either (the pole, which is on the parabola) or, dividing by ,

    The pole need not be listed separately, since the formula already gives at . Sanity check: at , , which is the point — on . ✓ The equation is uglier in polar form, as expected for a curve that is neither circular nor centered at the origin.

  5. Show the solution to question 5

    (a) Integrate by parts. Take and , so and :

    Because the curve is closed, and , so the boundary term is . Hence

    Call the common value . Then as well: all three expressions agree for every closed curve, whether or not it encloses anything sensibly. (What the proposition on enclosed area adds is that, for a simple counterclockwise curve, this common number is the area.)

    (b) Choose the interval and check the orientation. The right-hand lobe is where , that is . At the point is ; at it is ; at it is ; at it is ; at it is back at . Origin, then below the axis, then the far right, then above the axis: that is counterclockwise, and the lobe is traced once without crossing itself. The proposition applies.

    With and ,

    Use the product-to-sum identities and :

    Therefore

    Sanity check: eliminating the parameter, , so the lobe is symmetric about the -axis and . With , , this is . ✓

    (c) The integral over the whole figure is zero. By the same antiderivative,

    The reason is orientation. On the pen traces the left lobe: from the origin to at , to at , to at , back to the origin. Below the axis first, then the far left, then above: in the left half-plane that is clockwise, so this lobe contributes and the two lobes cancel. The enclosed-area proposition does not apply to the whole curve because the curve crosses itself, and a self-crossing figure eight is exactly a curve whose two halves have opposite orientations. The total area enclosed by the figure eight is , obtained by treating the lobes separately.

  6. Show the solution to question 6

    (a) Symmetry, zeros, sign. Replacing by leaves , and so the equation, unchanged: the curve is symmetric about the line , the -axis. (Replacing by changes the sign of the sine term, so no symmetry about the -axis is detected — and there is none.)

    when : and . The radius is negative exactly when , that is for , and positive elsewhere on . Its largest value is at and its most negative is at .

    Values at the standard angles: : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : .

    (b) The drawing must show two loops, both hanging below the -axis, meeting at the pole.

    Outer loop. Start at at the pole and let increase. The radius grows, so the pen leaves the pole along the ray at , rises to a small hump above the -axis and comes back down through at . Then it sweeps through the third quadrant, passing at (where ), reaches the lowest point at , climbs through at , crosses the axis at at , makes the mirror-image hump, and returns to the pole along the ray at as . The humps are genuine: on we have with , which is positive and largest at , giving at . So the outer loop pokes up to height on each side of the pole before crossing the axis at .

    Inner loop. For the radius is negative, so every point is plotted on the opposite ray, at directions between and — below the axis. Leaving the pole at the pen heads in the direction , curls down to at (the point ), and returns to the pole from the direction . This small loop lies inside the outer one, spanning .

    At the pole. The two rays and (and their extensions) are the tangent lines there, by the tangent-at-the-pole theorem: at those angles and . So the drawing must show the curve crossing itself at the origin along the lines , with each loop leaving and re-entering along these directions.

    Mark on the sketch: , , , , the hump tops , and the two tangent lines at the pole. The whole picture is symmetric about the -axis, as (a) promised.

    (c) Two names for one point. The Cartesian point has polar coordinates , and at the equation gives , not — so the curve does not pass through at that angle. But the same point is also , and at the equation gives . ✓ A point is on a polar curve if any of its representations satisfies the equation, and here it is the negative- representation that does. This is the inner loop's lowest point, reached when the pen faces straight up and walks one unit backwards. Testing a single representation, as one would in Cartesian coordinates, would wrongly exclude it.

  7. Show the solution to question 7

    (a) Proof. Write for . By the slope formula for polar curves, wherever ,

    Apply the subtraction formula and multiply numerator and denominator by to clear both fractions:

    In the numerator the terms cancel () and what remains is . In the denominator the terms cancel () and what remains is . Hence

    (If the tangent is vertical and is undefined; the same identity is obtained by working with instead, so nothing is lost. If the formula says is infinite, that is : at the points nearest to and farthest from the pole the tangent is perpendicular to the radius, which is geometrically evident.)

    The formula is the polar counterpart of the slope: is not a slope, but the ratio is the tangent of the angle between curve and radius.

    (b) Logarithmic spiral. For , , so

    which does not depend on . So the spiral meets every ray from the pole at the same angle — this is the defining property of the logarithmic spiral, and the reason it appears in nautilus shells and in the flight path of a moth circling a lamp. For , and : the spiral crosses every ray at .

    Consistency check: for the arc-length integrand is , and is exactly , the factor by which a path at to the radial direction is longer than its radial component.

    (c) Cardioid. With and , use the half-angle forms and :

    since . Hence (modulo , which is all a line's direction determines) for .

    Check at . : the tangent is perpendicular to the radial line, which at is the -axis. So the tangent at is vertical. ✓

    Check at . , so the tangent direction is : the tangent is horizontal at the point , which is the highest point of the cardioid. ✓ Both agree with the direct computation of from the slope formula, but the angle delivers them with almost no algebra.

  8. Show the solution to question 8

    (a) The wrong line is the first sentence of Step 1: "the area enclosed by the outer loop is ".

    The area formula measures the region swept from the pole outward as runs from to , one thin sector at a time. On every point of the curve is visited once, so the curve is traced once — but that is not the hypothesis that matters. On the radius is negative and the sectors reach from the pole to the inner loop; those sectors lie inside the inner loop, and the inner loop itself sits inside the outer loop, so this part of the plane is being counted a second time. What actually computes is : the outer loop's area with the inner loop's area added on top, not the outer loop's area alone.

    Step 2 is correct as it stands: the formula does not mind , since is squared, and the sectors for fill the inner loop exactly once. Step 3 subtracts the right thing from the wrong thing.

    (b) Repair. From Step 1, correctly read,

    The student's final number is the area of the outer loop, inner loop included — a true statement attached to the wrong question. The required area is

    Direct verification: the outer loop is traced where , that is for . With the same antiderivative ,

    using and the fact that is odd. This agrees with the repaired Step 1, so stands.

    Sanity check: the outer loop reaches on the right and on the -axis, and only at the pole where the loops meet, so it is roughly an oval of length and height a little over ; an area around is right, and the inner loop is tiny (), so removing it changes little.

    The general rule: integrate only over the angles that sweep the region you want, and read a negative as a warning that the sectors have jumped to the other side of the pole.

  9. Show the solution to question 9

    (a) Intersections, all three checks. Solving together with gives , so and

    Second check, opposite representations: a point of the circle is also , and satisfies under exactly the same condition (the lemniscate's equation already contains both signs of , and ). No new points. Third check, the pole: the circle never has , so the pole is not an intersection. There are exactly four intersection points, with Cartesian coordinates

    (b) The picture. The lemniscate is a figure eight along the -axis: it exists only where , that is for (right loop) and (left loop), and each loop reaches out to at the tip. The circle of radius is centered at the pole. Since , each loop of the lemniscate pokes out through the circle: inside the circle near the pole, outside it near the tip. The crossing angles say where: for we have , so the lemniscate is outside the circle; for it is inside. The required region is the two "caps" of the loops that stick out past the circle, one on each side, symmetric about both axes.

    (c) Area of the caps. Over the outer curve is the lemniscate and the inner curve is the circle, so by the area-between formula the right-hand cap has area

    By the symmetry of both curves under , the left cap is congruent, and

    Sanity check: a cap is roughly a triangle with base the chord from to (length ) and apex at (height ), area ; the cap bulges outside that triangle, so about per cap is plausible.

    (d) Inside both, by subtraction. The area enclosed by the whole lemniscate is, by the polar area formula applied to each loop once,

    The part of the lemniscate that is inside the circle is everything except the two caps:

    Sanity check: the disc has area and the lemniscate ; their overlap must be less than and must contain the lemniscate's neighbourhood of the pole, so is sensible. Doing this directly would have needed of over plus over ; subtraction is quicker and uses only integrals already done.

  10. Show the solution to question 10

    (a) Spiral. is continuous, and is strictly increasing on , so the curve moves steadily outward and no point is visited twice. Then

    Substitute , ; the limits become :

    Sanity check: the curve runs from the pole to the point at distance in the direction , so it is longer than but, since it sweeps through only about a third of a turn while growing, not hugely so; fits.

    (b) Surface swept by one loop of the lemniscate. The right-hand loop is . Rotating the whole loop about the -axis produces the same surface as rotating its upper half, , where as the formula requires; so integrate over the upper half only.

    On , and , so

    and the integrand of the surface formula is

    A word about hypotheses. As the derivative is unbounded, so the theorem's "continuous derivative on " fails at the endpoint and the integral is, strictly, improper: . But the integrand has simplified to something continuous on the closed interval, so the limit exists and equals the ordinary integral:

    Sanity check: the loop runs from the pole to , and its greatest height is where () is largest, at : . That widest point is at , where . The double cone with apexes at the pole and at and that radius at has slant heights about and , hence lateral area about ; the lemniscate's rounded profile bulges outside this cone, so is the right size.

    (c) Why not ? Two reasons, one geometric and one formal. Geometrically, the lower half of the loop () sweeps out exactly the same surface as the upper half, so integrating over both halves would count every point of the surface twice — if the integrand were positive. Formally it is not: the hypothesis fails for , and the simplified integrand is negative there. Integrating over the full loop gives

    a surface of area zero: the lower half's contribution cancels the upper half's instead of doubling it. The formula is a signed quantity when changes sign, and the hypothesis is what makes it an area.

  11. Show the solution to question 11

    (a) The focal distance. Since lies on the ellipse, , and . Then

    Expand the last product: . The and terms cancel against the first three, leaving

    To take the square root we need the sign of . Every point of the ellipse has (the equation forces ), so because . Hence and

    The distance to a focus is a linear function of : as moves from the far vertex , at distance , to the near vertex , at distance , the focal distance decreases uniformly with .

    (b) Focus and directrix. Let be the vertical line . Since , , so lies to the right of the whole ellipse and the distance from to is

    Multiply by : by (a). So every point of the ellipse satisfies , with as focus and as directrix.

    This is the focus–directrix description with the same eccentricity , established here directly from the Cartesian equation rather than by converting the polar form; the two definitions of agree because they are describing the same number. (The mirror-image statement pairs with the directrix .)

    The hypothesis is needed: for a circle, , the "directrix" recedes to infinity and the ratio description degenerates. That is why the focus–directrix definition covers ellipses, parabolas and hyperbolas but not circles, which it reaches only as a limit.

    (c) The defining property, recovered. Replacing by in (a) — equivalently, reflecting the picture in the -axis, which sends to and to — gives , positive for the same reason. Adding,

    independent of . This is the sum-of-distances definition of the ellipse, and it identifies the constant as , the length of the major axis — as the vertex shows directly: its distances to the foci are and . So (a) is a sharpening of the definition: not only is the sum constant, but each summand is known separately, and the two-square-root algebra that derived the standard equation from the definition can be run backwards in one line.

  12. Show the solution to question 12

    (a) Divide by the constant first. , so : a hyperbola. From , ; the minus-sine form puts the directrix on the negative side, at . (Reading straight off the original denominator is the standard slip; it would still say hyperbola, but every number after it would be wrong.)

    The vertices lie on the axis perpendicular to the directrix, and :

    The first has negative , so it is plotted units in the opposite direction, straight down. Both vertices are on the negative -axis, apart, so and the center is their midpoint, . The focus at the origin is from the center, and . ✓ Then , and the Cartesian equation, with the transverse axis vertical, is

    Which branch is which: where , and those angles trace the branch through , the one that wraps around the focus at the origin; the angles with give and trace the far branch through . Check that the directrix is where it should be: a hyperbola's directrix lies between center and vertex at distance from the center, and . ✓

    (b) Two vertices determine . Nearest and farthest points on the polar axis means vertices at and , so the cosine form applies (plus sign, because the near vertex is at , on the directrix side). The two conditions are

    Dividing, , so and : an ellipse, as it had to be for a closed orbit. Then , so and

    Check: gives and gives . ✓ Reading off the geometry: the major axis has length , so ; the center is at , the focus at the origin is from it, and ✓; . The same equation comes from , and the nearest and farthest distances are and — a planet with those distances from its sun has .

    (c) The chord through the focus. In the cosine form the axis is the -axis, and the chord through the focus perpendicular to it lies along and . At both angles , so on each side of the focus, and the chord has length , whatever is — the same for a parabola as for an ellipse or hyperbola. (The sine forms behave identically with and .)

    For the ellipse in (b): . For the hyperbola in (a): the chord lies along and , where , so its length is ; both endpoints have positive , so both lie on the near branch, as a chord through a focus of a hyperbola must.

    Cross-check with the Cartesian data: for an ellipse , so the chord is . ✓ For the hyperbola, , giving . ✓

Full solutions sheet →