Integration is the reverse of differentiation. Where derivatives break things apart to measure rates, integrals put things together to measure totals.
The integral gives the net area between the curve and the -axis from to . But integrals are far more than area: they compute distance, work, probability, volume, and any accumulated quantity.
Mastering integration requires two skills: knowing the antiderivative formulas and knowing the techniques to transform difficult integrals into ones you can solve.
The big idea: Riemann sums
Divide the interval into thin strips of width . In each strip, build a rectangle with height .
The total area of all rectangles is approximately . This is a Riemann sum.
As (strips get infinitely thin), the Riemann sum converges to the definite integral: .
This is why integrals represent accumulation: you are adding up infinitely many infinitesimally small contributions.
Setting up a Riemann sum
- Estimate using a right Riemann sum with rectangles.
- Width of each rectangle: .
- Right endpoints: .
- Heights: .
- Sum: .
- The exact answer (using the FTC) is . Our overestimate of comes from the right endpoints overshooting on an increasing function. With more rectangles, the estimate converges to .
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC)
FTC Part 1: if , then . Differentiation and integration are inverse operations.
FTC Part 2: where is any antiderivative of (meaning ).
Part 2 is the computational powerhouse: instead of computing limits of Riemann sums, just find an antiderivative and evaluate at the bounds.
The connection to derivatives: if position is and velocity is , then total displacement is . Integration recovers position from velocity.
💡Explain it simply
Imagine you're on a road trip. Your speedometer tells you how fast you're going at each moment (that's the derivative — the rate). The odometer tells you the total distance you've covered (that's the integral — the accumulation).
The FTC says: if you know the speedometer reading at every moment, you can figure out the total distance by 'adding up' all those tiny speeds. And the shortcut is: just check the odometer at the start and end, and subtract.
That's why it's called the Fundamental Theorem — it connects the two main ideas in all of calculus (rates and totals) and gives you a shortcut so you never have to actually add up infinitely many tiny rectangles.
Evaluating a definite integral with the FTC
- Compute .
- Step 1 — find an antiderivative: . (We don't need the for definite integrals.)
- Step 2 — evaluate at the bounds using FTC Part 2: .
- .
- .
- .
- This is the net area under the line from to . Since on this interval, the net area equals the total area.
Net area vs. total area
The definite integral computes net (signed) area: regions above the -axis contribute positively, regions below contribute negatively.
If you want total area (all positive), integrate the absolute value: .
In practice, find where , split the interval at those zeros, and flip the sign on intervals where .
Antiderivatives and the constant of integration
An indefinite integral represents the family of all antiderivatives of .
Since the derivative of a constant is , any two antiderivatives differ by a constant. That's why we write .
Never forget on indefinite integrals. It's not optional: it represents an infinite family of solutions.
Common integrals (your core toolbox)
- for .
- . (The power rule doesn't work for .)
- and .
- and .
- and .
- and .
- and .
Substitution (reverse chain rule)
If the integrand looks like , substitute so .
The integral becomes , which is usually simpler.
Example: . Let , . Integral becomes .
For definite integrals, either convert the bounds to -values, or back-substitute and use the original bounds.
Tip: look for an "inner function" whose derivative (or a constant multiple of it) appears as a factor in the integrand.
💡Explain it simply
Substitution is like changing languages to make a sentence easier to read. The math looks complicated in -language, so you switch to -language where it's simpler.
The trick is spotting the 'inside function.' Look at your integral and ask: is there a function stuffed inside another function? If yes, call the inside part . If the derivative of that inside part is also floating around in the integral, you're golden — everything converts cleanly to .
When you're done integrating in -land, just swap back to . It's like translating your answer back to the original language.
u-substitution with a definite integral
- Compute .
- Spot the pattern: the inner function is and its derivative appears as a factor. Perfect for substitution.
- Let , so . The in the integral is exactly .
- Convert the bounds: when , . When , .
- The integral becomes .
- Integrate: .
- Final answer: . No need to back-substitute since we converted the bounds.
Integration by parts (reverse product rule)
Formula: . This comes from the product rule run backwards.
Choose and using the LIATE heuristic: Logarithms, Inverse trig, Algebraic (), Trig, Exponentials. Pick from higher in this list.
Example: . Let (algebraic), . Then , .
Result: .
Sometimes you need to apply by-parts twice (e.g., ) or use the tabular method for repeated applications.
A special case: requires by-parts twice, then solving for the integral algebraically.
💡Explain it simply
Imagine you're trying to find the area of a weird shape made by two things multiplied together. You can't handle both at once, so you break the job into pieces.
The idea: pick one part to differentiate (make simpler) and the other to integrate. You do one step of the problem, and in exchange, the remaining integral becomes easier. It's like trading a hard problem for an easier one.
The LIATE trick tells you which part to pick as : Logs first, then Inverse trig, Algebra (, ), Trig, and Exponentials last. Pick from higher in the list because those get simpler when you differentiate them.
Integration by parts: x·sin(x)
- Compute .
- We have a product of algebraic () and trig (). By LIATE, pick (algebraic is above trig).
- Set and .
- Differentiate : . Integrate : .
- Apply the formula :
- .
- The remaining integral is easy: .
- Final answer: .
- Check: differentiate using the product rule on the first term: . Correct!
Trigonometric integrals
Powers of sin and cos: for , use the following strategies:
If one power is odd, peel off one factor, convert the rest using , and substitute.
If both powers are even, use the half-angle identities: and .
Example: .
Example: . Let : result is .
Trigonometric substitution
For integrands involving , , or , use trig substitutions:
: let , so .
: let , so .
: let , so .
After substituting, the square root disappears and you get a trig integral. Evaluate, then convert back to using a reference triangle.
Partial fractions
To integrate a rational function where , decompose it into simpler fractions.
Factor the denominator, then write: .
Solve for and by clearing denominators and comparing coefficients or plugging in strategic values.
Repeated factors: requires terms .
Irreducible quadratics: for in the denominator, the numerator is , not just .
If , perform polynomial long division first, then decompose the remainder.
Partial fraction decomposition
- Compute .
- Decompose: .
- Multiply both sides by : .
- Smart substitution — let : , so .
- Let : , so .
- The integral becomes .
- .
Improper integrals
An improper integral has an infinite bound or an integrand with an infinite discontinuity.
Type 1 (infinite bound): . This converges.
Type 2 (discontinuity): . This also converges.
If the limit is finite, the improper integral converges. If the limit is or does not exist, it diverges.
Key result: converges if and diverges if . This mirrors the p-series test.
Which technique should I use? (Decision tree)
1. Simplify first: can algebra, trig identities, or long division reduce the integral?
2. Check the table: is it a standard form you already know?
3. Substitution: is there an inner function whose derivative appears in the integrand?
4. Trig integrals: powers of and ? Use identities.
5. Trig substitution: see or ?
6. Integration by parts: product of two different types of functions?
7. Partial fractions: rational function with a factorable denominator?
Practice is the only way to develop intuition for which technique to try first.
Area between curves and volumes (preview)
Area between and on : . Determine which function is on top on each sub-interval.
Volume by disks/washers: revolve a region around the -axis: .
Volume by shells: revolve around the -axis: .
These are applications of integration, extending the concept of 'summing up infinitely many small pieces' to 2D and 3D geometry.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Forgetting on indefinite integrals. Every indefinite integral has a constant of integration.
- Trying to use the power rule for . The power rule gives which is undefined. The answer is .
- Forgetting to change the bounds when using substitution in a definite integral. Either convert bounds to -values or back-substitute before evaluating.
- Choosing and poorly in integration by parts. If is harder than the original, try swapping your choices.
- In partial fractions, forgetting to do polynomial long division first when the degree of the numerator is the degree of the denominator.
- Not checking convergence of improper integrals. Always set up the limit explicitly before evaluating.
- Getting sign errors with trig antiderivatives: (note the negative sign).