Sequences are ordered lists of numbers, and series are their sums. The fundamental question of this entire topic: when you add up infinitely many numbers, can you get a finite answer?
Series are not just theoretical: they underpin how computers calculate , , and . Taylor series let you approximate any smooth function with a polynomial. Power series extend calculus into the realm of infinite-degree polynomials.
This module covers convergence tests (the toolkit for determining if a series converges), power series, and Taylor/Maclaurin series. Master the tests systematically and you'll always know which tool to reach for.
Sequences and their limits
A sequence is an ordered list: The sequence converges if for some finite .
Common sequences: , , diverges (oscillates).
Tools for evaluating sequence limits: L'Hôpital's Rule (treat as a continuous variable ), Squeeze Theorem, and the fact that exponentials dominate polynomials which dominate logarithms: for .
A sequence is monotonic if it is always increasing or always decreasing. A bounded monotonic sequence always converges (Monotone Convergence Theorem).
Series: partial sums and convergence
A series is the limit of its partial sums: . If exists and is finite, the series converges.
Key distinction: a sequence converging to is necessary for the series to converge, but not sufficient. , yet diverges.
The harmonic series diverges. This is one of the most important facts in the theory of series. It shows that terms going to zero isn't enough.
💡Explain it simply
Imagine stacking blocks. Each block is thinner than the last. The question is: does the tower reach a finite height, or does it grow forever?
If each block is half as thick as the previous one (like ), the tower settles at height 2. That's a convergent series. But if each block is (harmonic series), the blocks get thinner but not fast enough — the tower grows forever, just very slowly.
So 'the pieces get smaller' isn't enough. They have to get smaller fast enough. The convergence tests are all about measuring whether 'fast enough' is satisfied.
Geometric series
A geometric series has the form where is the first term and is the common ratio.
It converges if and only if , and the sum is .
Example: .
This is the only common series where we can easily compute the exact sum. Many convergence tests compare other series to geometric ones.
Summing a geometric series
- Compute .
- Rewrite: this is . So and .
- Check: , so it converges.
- Apply the formula: .
- The sum is . Note: even though terms alternate sign, the geometric series formula handles this perfectly.
Telescoping series
A telescoping series is one where most terms cancel in the partial sum.
Example: .
The partial sum is . As , .
To recognize telescoping: use partial fractions to decompose the general term. If consecutive terms cancel, you have a telescoping series.
The Divergence Test (nth-term test)
If , then diverges. Period.
This should always be your first check. It's quick and catches obvious divergence.
If , the test is inconclusive. You need another test. (Remember: has but diverges.)
p-series and the harmonic series
A p-series is .
Converges if and diverges if .
: harmonic series (diverges). : (converges). : (diverges).
p-series are the benchmark for comparison tests. When you see -like terms, think p-series.
The Integral Test
If is positive, continuous, and decreasing for , and , then and either both converge or both diverge.
The integral test does not give the sum of the series, only whether it converges.
Example: test . Compare with . The integral converges, so the series converges.
This is how we prove the p-series convergence criteria: converges iff .
Comparison and Limit Comparison Tests
Direct comparison: if for all and converges, then converges. If diverges, then diverges.
Limit comparison: if where , then and either both converge or both diverge.
Strategy: compare your series to a known p-series or geometric series. Pick by keeping only the dominant terms.
Example: test . For large , this behaves like . Limit comparison with (converges) confirms convergence.
Ratio and Root Tests
Ratio test: compute . If : converges absolutely. : diverges. : inconclusive.
Root test: compute . Same criteria as the ratio test.
The ratio test excels for series with factorials (like ) or products. The root test is ideal for terms raised to the th power (like ).
Warning: both tests are inconclusive when . This happens for all p-series, so you can't use ratio/root tests on .
Ratio test on a factorial series
- Does converge or diverge?
- Use the ratio test. Compute .
- Simplify: and .
- So .
- Take the limit: .
- Since (in fact ), the series diverges. The factorial grows so much faster than that the terms blow up.
Alternating Series Test
An alternating series has the form where .
It converges if: (1) is eventually decreasing and (2) .
Example: . (The alternating harmonic series.)
Alternating series estimation: the error after summing terms is at most . This gives a built-in error bound.
Absolute vs. conditional convergence
A series converges absolutely if converges. It converges conditionally if converges but diverges.
Absolute convergence implies convergence. So if the absolute value series converges, you're done.
Example: converges absolutely because converges.
Example: converges conditionally. It converges by the alternating series test, but diverges.
Why it matters: absolutely convergent series can be rearranged freely without changing the sum. Conditionally convergent series cannot (Riemann rearrangement theorem).
💡Explain it simply
Think of absolute convergence like having money in the bank. Even if some terms are positive and some are negative, if the total amount of money moving around (ignoring direction) is finite, you're safe. The sum is solid and reliable.
Conditional convergence is like balancing on a tightrope. The positive and negative terms cancel each other out just right to give a finite sum, but it's fragile. If you rearrange the order you add them, you can get a completely different answer (or no answer at all). It only works because of the specific order.
Power series
A power series centered at is . It converges on some interval centered at .
The radius of convergence determines where it converges: (converges), (diverges). At (the endpoints), you must check separately.
Find using the ratio test: (or the root test).
Inside the radius, power series behave like polynomials: you can differentiate and integrate them term by term.
Example: the geometric series for is a power series with .
Taylor and Maclaurin series
The Taylor series of centered at is: .
A Maclaurin series is a Taylor series centered at .
Essential Maclaurin series to memorize:
for all .
for all .
for all .
for .
for .
💡Explain it simply
A Taylor series is like building a copy of a function out of simple polynomial building blocks ().
Imagine you want to recreate a complicated curve. First, you match the value at one point (constant term). Then you match the slope (linear term). Then the curvature ( term). Each new term makes your copy more accurate, like adding more detail to a sketch.
With enough terms, your polynomial copy becomes indistinguishable from the original function. That's how your calculator computes — it's not drawing a circle, it's evaluating a polynomial like that happens to equal to many decimal places.
Computing a Taylor series from scratch
- Find the Maclaurin series for (centered at ).
- We need for each . Since , every derivative of is .
- So , , , , and so on. Every derivative at equals .
- Plug into the Taylor formula: .
- Written out:
- This converges for all . For example, .
Deriving a series by substitution
- Find the Maclaurin series for .
- Instead of computing derivatives (which get very messy), use the known series for and substitute for .
- We know: .
- Replace with : .
- Written out:
- This is the Gaussian function used in probability and statistics. Its integral has no closed form — but we can integrate the series term by term!
Taylor remainder and error bounds
The th degree Taylor polynomial approximates . The error is .
Taylor's inequality: where is an upper bound for on the interval between and .
For alternating series, the error after terms is bounded by the first omitted term: .
This is critical for applications: you can determine how many terms you need for a desired accuracy.
Building new series from known ones
Substitution: replace in a known series. E.g., .
Differentiation: .
Integration: .
These techniques let you derive new series without computing derivatives from scratch.
Choosing the right convergence test (strategy)
1. Divergence test first: if , done (diverges).
2. Is it geometric? Check if .
3. Is it a p-series? Check if .
4. Does it telescope? Try partial fractions.
5. Are there factorials or th powers? Try ratio or root test.
6. Does it look like a known series? Try comparison or limit comparison.
7. Is it alternating? Try the alternating series test.
8. Is easy to integrate? Try the integral test.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Using the divergence test to 'prove' convergence. If , the test tells you nothing. It can only prove divergence.
- Applying the ratio or root test to a p-series. These tests always give (inconclusive) for .
- Forgetting to check the endpoints of a power series interval. The series may converge at one endpoint, both, or neither.
- Confusing absolute and conditional convergence. Absolute convergence ( converges) is strictly stronger than conditional convergence.
- Computing Taylor coefficients incorrectly: the th coefficient is , not . Don't forget the in the denominator.
- Trying to determine the sum of a series when the question only asks about convergence. Most convergent series don't have nice closed-form sums.
- Not simplifying before choosing a test. Algebra can often reveal the right comparison or simplify the ratio test calculation.